After four years of Joe Biden’s walking around and appearing lost, there’s little surprise in the Democrats’ latest mental wanderings into the land of exaggeration and fibs.Looking for a unifying cause, they are now rallying around illegal immigration and wasteful spending, spreading lies and hyperbole. Among the latest examples of both exaggeration and lying is Governor Murphy’s hint that he, like Hermine "Miep" Gies Santrouschitz, was protector of the oppressed and persecuted. Like Miep who hid Anne Frank, Murphy suggested he was housing an illegal alien in his garage attic. Turns out he was, in the I’ve-been-caught-in-a-lie-words of Democrats like Hillary Clinton, “misspeaking.” Running contemporaneously on the lie meter was the statement by Governor Pritzker that ICE raided an elementary school—No, it was the Secret Service after someone who had made a threat. The implication? A heartless ICE was scaring little kids and trying to separate them from their parents.
Without regard for the American citizens affected by illegal alien gang members in New Jersey and Illinois, both governors have used lies and exaggeration to support the party line that Trump is a dictator-fascist-Nazi-Russian-racist-felon-operative without concern for the poor and downtrodden. The gang activities were inconsequential, they intimated. Add to that narrative Trump’s obsession with excluding men from women’s sports, locker rooms, and restrooms. Where, one might ask, is a young girl to go to learn about male anatomy if not in a women’s locker room?
We Are the World
This morning I turned on CBS’s news to see a reporter's interview in Sudan that a temporary cessation in funding by USAID will lead to suffering and death. Remind anyone of the Ethiopian crisis that inspired singers to raise money? The report focused on a kid whom doctors helped. Without that help…Yeah, millions will starve and little kids will go without food and medical care. Need to feel guilty? Pull up that TV segment on your smart phone as you drink your morning coffee and munch on your scone at Starve-bucks.
So, how is eliminating money spent on condoms in Gaza, comic books and musicals on transgenderism in Peru and Ireland, and DEI In Serbia going to feed Sudanese? By the way, as the late comic Sam Kinison once said about starving kids in eastern Africa, “Surely, the reporter and film crew could have given the kid a sandwich.” And just as surely, the reporter could have said that the focus on USAID by Elon Musk was on wasteful spending that is not in the interest of desperate humanity in general and US in particular. How, Mr. USAID employee and Senator Schumer, as you stand in protest in front of TV cameras, does funding a play on transgenderism in a foreign country serve either? How does supporting DEI in a foreign country serve American interests?
In the Cookie Jar
The mainstream media can’t seem to shake off their affinity for the Democratic Party. The loyalty of the press prevents them from asking serious questions about how the government is run or how government employees serve Democrats first and the
American people second. It hasn’t occurred to the media to ask about the relationship between government employees and the Democratic Party as evidenced by contributions. Democrats really do have their hands in the cookie jar: In the 2024 election cycle, USAID staff made a total of $406,790 in political contributions, according to data collected on OpenSecrets. More than half of that, $241,079, went to the former Vice President Kamala Harris. Only $999 — a quarter of a percent — went to President Donald Trump.” (Source: Daily Wire at https://joemiller.us/2025/02/97-of-political-contributions-from-usaid-employees-went-to-dems/ ) This relationship between Democrats and government employees has evolved with the burgeoning number of people who work in the government’s growing agencies. And there’s virtually no oversight with clout—at least not until now and DOGE. An obvious, if unspoken, relationship exists between USAID employees and the Democrats.
So, now, the work of DOGE has motivated the Democrats to go once again for impeachment. “Who elected Elon Musk,” they shout. To counter, I would ask, “Who elected the USAID employees who pushed an alphabet agenda on American taxpayers and made transgenderism in foreign countries an issue worth funding? Who among the unelected agency’s officials decided that a transgender play is more important than feeding that Sudanese kid?
Without regard for the American citizens affected by illegal alien gang members in New Jersey and Illinois, both governors have used lies and exaggeration to support the party line that Trump is a dictator-fascist-Nazi-Russian-racist-felon-operative without concern for the poor and downtrodden. The gang activities were inconsequential, they intimated. Add to that narrative Trump’s obsession with excluding men from women’s sports, locker rooms, and restrooms. Where, one might ask, is a young girl to go to learn about male anatomy if not in a women’s locker room?
We Are the World
This morning I turned on CBS’s news to see a reporter's interview in Sudan that a temporary cessation in funding by USAID will lead to suffering and death. Remind anyone of the Ethiopian crisis that inspired singers to raise money? The report focused on a kid whom doctors helped. Without that help…Yeah, millions will starve and little kids will go without food and medical care. Need to feel guilty? Pull up that TV segment on your smart phone as you drink your morning coffee and munch on your scone at Starve-bucks.
So, how is eliminating money spent on condoms in Gaza, comic books and musicals on transgenderism in Peru and Ireland, and DEI In Serbia going to feed Sudanese? By the way, as the late comic Sam Kinison once said about starving kids in eastern Africa, “Surely, the reporter and film crew could have given the kid a sandwich.” And just as surely, the reporter could have said that the focus on USAID by Elon Musk was on wasteful spending that is not in the interest of desperate humanity in general and US in particular. How, Mr. USAID employee and Senator Schumer, as you stand in protest in front of TV cameras, does funding a play on transgenderism in a foreign country serve either? How does supporting DEI in a foreign country serve American interests?
In the Cookie Jar
The mainstream media can’t seem to shake off their affinity for the Democratic Party. The loyalty of the press prevents them from asking serious questions about how the government is run or how government employees serve Democrats first and the
American people second. It hasn’t occurred to the media to ask about the relationship between government employees and the Democratic Party as evidenced by contributions. Democrats really do have their hands in the cookie jar: In the 2024 election cycle, USAID staff made a total of $406,790 in political contributions, according to data collected on OpenSecrets. More than half of that, $241,079, went to the former Vice President Kamala Harris. Only $999 — a quarter of a percent — went to President Donald Trump.” (Source: Daily Wire at https://joemiller.us/2025/02/97-of-political-contributions-from-usaid-employees-went-to-dems/ ) This relationship between Democrats and government employees has evolved with the burgeoning number of people who work in the government’s growing agencies. And there’s virtually no oversight with clout—at least not until now and DOGE. An obvious, if unspoken, relationship exists between USAID employees and the Democrats.
So, now, the work of DOGE has motivated the Democrats to go once again for impeachment. “Who elected Elon Musk,” they shout. To counter, I would ask, “Who elected the USAID employees who pushed an alphabet agenda on American taxpayers and made transgenderism in foreign countries an issue worth funding? Who among the unelected agency’s officials decided that a transgender play is more important than feeding that Sudanese kid?
RSS Feed