Titanium. Stuff of fighter jets. Price tag for the new toilet: $23 million.**
I think of a couple of local kitchen/bathroom companies that daily show up in commercials during the local news. Gosh! I wish NASA had contracted with those guys. I’m sure they could have supplied a toilet, even a zero-G toilet, for less, and that includes one-day installation with a two-year warranty.
I understand that going to the bathroom in space is a challenge. Wouldn’t want to do it myself. I also understand that the process is a bit more complicated for women than for men. The new toilet is supposed to solve that problem, bringing true equality to the sexes in a symbolic sign of the times, as well as a practical solution to a real problem.
But that toilet is a lesson about “equality.” Making people equal means accommodating. Otherwise, those-who-can-and-do inevitably outperform those who-cannot-or-do-not-do.
Now, lest you think I don’t want female astronauts to enjoy the comforts of home as they embark on dangerous flights in space, I’ll say that I’m happy that the ladies will be accommodated with a commode. They are “those-who-can-and-do” more than I; I’ve never been to outer space and I won’t be going even if Space X, Blue Origin, or Virgin Galactic reduce the cost of a seat on one of their spaceships. So, yes, I’m acknowledging that the women who go to space are “more equal” than I, probably more capable, and definitely less claustrophobic. I could, I suppose, enter a capsule for a space center tour, but that’s about it. Sitting in one for long periods, or floating around in the cylinders of the International Space Station for months just isn’t a job I would want. Anyway, enough about my shortcomings except to say that they indicate how I am not the equal of female astronauts.
We do live in a Time of Accommodation. And the milieu isn’t enhancing what we are as a species unless we judge ourselves by our compassion. That we accommodate is ethically and morally good in many respects, but not so good in some others. Making ramps for people in wheelchairs is an act of compassion; they deserve the accommodation. But we have taken accommodating to the extreme.
About 25 years ago, an educational system called Outcomes Based Education swept around the nation. As it was locally interpreted, teachers were supposed to retest entire classes if they failed to achieve an average of 70% on a test. That meant, of course, that students who scored 100% on a test had to retest. That’s accommodation in the extreme, and it is also a sign of an “equality-gone-wild” syndrome.
That some people obsess over the superior abilities and successes of others isn’t either new or mysterious. Envy pervades every generation. It’s one of those Seven Deadly Sins** that has driven people to seek accommodations as long as there have been people.
We also live in a Time of Handicapping. That is, in our attempt to “make all things equal,” we have gone to the extreme of limiting those with physical and mental “advantages.” Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” details such a society. In 2081, after the adoption of amendments to the American Constitution, a Handicapper General’s office that enforces laws requiring “equality” at the expense of an individual’s talents.**** Intelligent, athletic, and beautiful people must listen to distracting sounds, carry weights, and wear masks.
I’m for ramps. I’m for handicap stalls in public restrooms. I’m for a space toilet that accommodates women. I’m not for putting in extra steps for those who can walk. And I object to arbitrarily chosen qualifications on the grounds that those who impose qualifications are likely those who “cannot do” or cannot compete. I’m not for handicapping those who have superior abilities. I’m not for handicapping people with great accomplishments.
There’s a point to be made about the first Olympics. Regardless of the number of contestants, the ancient Greeks acknowledged only a winner. There was First Place. There was no Second Place. All who didn’t win were losers. Sounds cruel to the modern mind, of course, but, then, accommodating the feelings of all who didn’t win—or at least those who followed in second or third place—would probably befuddle those ancient Greeks. Gasp! Those who promulgated the Outcomes Based Education system wouldn’t have fared well 2,500 years ago in an Age of Anti-accommodation.
One wonders whether or not anyone who seeks accommodation by handicapping is actually aware of the consequences of accommodating-gone-wild: Mediocrity.
*https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-nasa-spen/
**https://phys.org/news/2020-10-potty-nasa-23m-titanium-space.html
***Pride, greed (avarice), lust, envy, wrath, gluttony, and sloth.
****It’s a short read and worth your effort.